Americans today are increasingly polarized, and partisan news media plays a significant role in this division. Most major cable news outlets present content that blends reporting with opinion, designed to shape how viewers interpret events rather than simply inform them. This approach is problematic because it prioritizes influence over accuracy — viewers are not getting neutral information but rather curated narratives meant to guide their thinking (Pew Research Center, 2020; Berry & Sobieraj, 2014).
Partisan outlets often cover opposing viewpoints negatively, emphasizing scandals, using inflammatory language, and relying on sensationalism and overgeneralizations. Research demonstrates that this coverage deepens polarization by promoting vilification of the opposing side, transforming political disagreement into something closer to hatred (Berry & Sobieraj, 2014). The incentive structure is clear: outrage drives ratings, so outlets are motivated to maximize emotional reactions rather than foster understanding (Garcia et al., 2024).
This dynamic has intensified as more Americans consume news through partisan cable outlets and social media influencers on platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and TikTok. Rather than thinking critically about what they are told, many people are encouraged to adopt predetermined positions rather than evaluate information independently. The result is an increasingly fragmented society where a growing number of people do not just disagree — they actively despise those on the other side (Pew Research Center, 2023a). Indeed, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey of 8,480 U.S. adults found that 65% of Americans always or often feel exhausted when thinking about politics, and 55% always or often feel angry (Pew Research Center, 2023a).
The Landscape
The uncomfortable reality is that partisan outlets — on both the right and the left — significantly outnumber genuinely neutral news sources. They span cable television, broadcast networks, streaming platforms, and digital media. They vary in reach and slant, but share a common structural incentive: emotional engagement drives audience retention, and audience retention drives revenue.
A systematic content analysis found that 100% of cable news analysis programming contains outrage-based rhetoric — inflammatory language deliberately deployed because it drives audience engagement and advertising revenue (Berry & Sobieraj, 2014). One hundred percent. Not “most of it.” All of it.
This is not a coincidence. It is a business model.
For those who want to navigate this landscape without being taken for a ride, the first step is learning to recognize what partisan content looks like — regardless of which direction it leans.
How to Tell If You Are Being Spun
Media bias is not some invisible force impossible to detect. There are consistent, recognizable patterns. Once you see them, you cannot unsee them.
Watch for emotional language where neutral language would do. Words like “slammed,” “destroyed,” “blasted,” “obliterated,” and “eviscerated” are not news words. They are engagement words. Actual journalism tells you what a person said. Spin tells you how outraged you should be about it. If the headline is designed to make your blood pressure spike before you finish reading it, that is not an accident.
Notice what is left out. Bias in media is often less about what is said and more about what is not said. A story that quotes only one side, presents only the most extreme version of an opposing argument, or omits key context is doing editorial work whether it admits it or not. Ask yourself: what would the other side say? If the article never addresses that, you are reading advocacy, not journalism.
Check whether the outlet covers both parties the same way. Research analyzing cable news content found that some outlets cover opposing political parties significantly more negatively than others, using inflammatory language asymmetrically (Garcia et al., 2024). A simple test: imagine the same story happening under the other party. Would this outlet cover it the same way? If the answer is obviously no, that tells you something important.
Distinguish between news and commentary. News is what happened. Commentary is what someone thinks about what happened. Both have their place — but they are not the same thing, and conflating them is one of the primary ways partisan media shapes how audiences interpret events before they have had a chance to think for themselves.
Use third-party bias evaluators. Organizations like AllSides and Ad Fontes Media systematically evaluate news sources for both political lean and factual reliability. Consulting them before trusting a new source takes about thirty seconds and is considerably more useful than going with your gut.
Where Independent Evaluators Point
We are not in the business of telling you what to trust. No news source is perfectly unbiased, and reasonable people disagree about which outlets lean which way. What we can do is point you toward the organizations that evaluate media bias systematically — and note which sources consistently score well across their methodologies.
Two organizations worth bookmarking: AllSides (allsides.com) rates news sources and individual articles for political bias using a combination of editorial review, blind surveys, and community feedback. Ad Fontes Media (adfontesmedia.com) produces an interactive Media Bias Chart that rates sources on both reliability and political lean using trained analyst teams. Neither is perfect, but both apply consistent, documented methodology across outlets — which is more than most of us do when we decide what to read.
The following sources are ones that both organizations have consistently rated toward the center of the bias spectrum for reliability and partisan lean. We are not endorsing them as gospel. We are noting that independent evaluators rate them among the lower-bias options currently available. As always — read critically, check the methodology, and draw your own conclusions.
Wire Services & News Cooperatives
The Associated Press (AP) is an independent, non-profit news cooperative. It is consistently rated among the lower-bias sources in mainstream English-language journalism by Ad Fontes Media and AllSides (Ad Fontes Media, 2026). Wire services like AP function differently from cable networks — they supply raw reporting to other outlets rather than building their own audience engagement machine, which removes some of the ratings-driven incentive to sensationalize. Available free on Roku and smart TVs through the Haystack News app.
Reuters operates similarly and is repeatedly rated toward the center of the media bias spectrum for both reliability and minimal partisan framing by multiple third-party evaluators (Ad Fontes Media, 2026). Also available free on Roku and smart TVs through the Haystack News app.
International
BBC News is identified by Ad Fontes Media and AllSides as one of the consistently lower-bias sources in English-language journalism (Ad Fontes Media, 2026). It is not without its critics — no outlet is — but it has rated consistently across methodologies over time.
Print/Digital
The Wall Street Journal is notable for a specific data point: it was the only news source in Pew Research Center’s 2014 media habits study that was more trusted than distrusted across all five ideological groups surveyed — consistent liberals, mostly liberals, mixed, mostly conservatives, and consistent conservatives (Pew Research Center, 2014). Its opinion section has a well-documented conservative lean; its news reporting operates under separate editorial standards. The distinction is worth knowing.
The Manufactured Divide
As the analysis above suggests, partisan outlets far outnumber genuinely neutral news sources. This imbalance helps explain why Americans are more divided and polarized than at any recent point in history. A 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that 28% of Americans now hold an unfavorable view of both major political parties — more than quadruple the 6% who did so in 1994 (Pew Research Center, 2023b). The division itself is the product being sold, and if you rely solely on partisan news, you are the consumer being targeted.
The anger, fear, and tribal animosity dividing fellow citizens over politics is largely manufactured. Research by Berry and Sobieraj (2014) confirmed it is engineered to capture attention and loyalty — not to inform or unite. Their systematic content analysis found that outrage tactics in partisan media function as a “lucrative, sound business strategy” driven by deregulation, market fragmentation, and the discovery that inflammatory content maximizes audience engagement (Berry & Sobieraj, 2014, p. 8). Subsequent research has confirmed this dynamic extends to social media algorithms, where content that evokes outrage is shared significantly more than factually accurate but emotionally neutral reporting (Garcia et al., 2024).
You have a choice. You can seek out genuinely unbiased reporting and think critically about what you consume, or you can allow partisan outlets and influencers to shape your worldview for you. Pew Research Center data consistently find that substantial majorities of Americans hold moderate views or mixed positions across different issues — 79% of Americans fall somewhere between consistently liberal and consistently conservative on political issues (Pew Research Center, 2014). Yet media outlets actively construct narratives that obscure this middle ground, amplifying the most extreme voices to maximize engagement (Berry & Sobieraj, 2014; Pew Research Center, 2023a).
Breaking free from partisan echo chambers is not always easy, but it starts with recognizing what you are being sold and choosing a different path.
References
Ad Fontes Media. (2026). Interactive media bias chart. https://adfontesmedia.com/interactive-media-bias-chart/
Berry, J. M., & Sobieraj, S. (2014). The outrage industry: Political opinion media and the new incivility. Oxford University Press.
Garcia, D., Lewis, R., & Rohrer, M. (2024). Selling anger (SSRN Working Paper No. 4816065). University of Colorado Boulder, Leeds School of Business. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4816065
Pew Research Center. (2014, October 21). Political polarization and media habits. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2014/10/21/political-polarization-media-habits/
Pew Research Center. (2020, January 24). U.S. media polarization and the 2020 election: A nation divided. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2020/01/24/u-s-media-polarization-and-the-2020-election-a-nation-divided/
Pew Research Center. (2023a, September 19). Americans’ dismal views of the nation’s politics. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/09/19/americans-dismal-views-of-the-nations-politics/
Pew Research Center. (2023b, December 8). Striking findings from 2023. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/12/08/striking-findings-from-2023/
Actually Govern is a project of Whimsy Books LLC d/b/a Actually Govern. We are non-partisan, unaffiliated with any political party, and committed to civic education over political tribalism.
